Glenwood "Bubba" Pysher went to the wrong house. That mistake cost him his life. And now, almost two weeks later, a police officer has been charged in the fatal shooting that happened on August 23.
This hits hard. A 22-year-old college student. Days away from returning to St. Elizabeth University in North Jersey for his senior year. Out celebrating a friend's 21st birthday. Made a wrong turn walking through a wooded area. Ended up at a stranger's door on Snyder Avenue in Upper Pottsgrove, Pennsylvania.
The homeowners thought someone was trying to break in. They called 911. Police responded. What happened next is now the subject of criminal charges.
Upper Pottsgrove Police Corporal Sean Farrell, 58, has been charged with voluntary manslaughter. He turned himself in to Montgomery County detectives on Tuesday. Bail was set at $75,000. A preliminary hearing is scheduled for September 10.
Montgomery County District Attorney Kevin Steele did not hold back. He said the shooting was not a legal use of deadly force under Pennsylvania law. He said Pysher posed no threat. He said Farrell had non-lethal options on his utility belt, including a taser, that he failed to use.
At the moment of the shooting, Pysher had his hands raised. He was unarmed. He was complying with commands. Farrell was positioned at a safe distance behind a vehicle. Still, he fired. Pysher was shot twice in the chest. The coroner ruled the death a homicide.
This is the part that makes my stomach turn. We have body camera footage. We have investigators who reviewed it. We have a district attorney who looked at the evidence and said, plainly, that this was not justified. That less lethal means were available. That deadly force was not necessary.
And yet it happened.
Voluntary manslaughter, as Steele described it, is an intentional killing carried out under an unreasonable belief that deadly force was necessary. Prosecutors concluded the shooting did not meet the legal standard for murder because the evidence did not support a finding of malice or premeditation. But it was still criminal. Still unreasonable. Still a life ended too soon.
Pysher's father has spoken about what his son's friends told him. That his son tried to enter what he thought was his friend's house. That he realized his mistake. That he was waiting for friends to pick him up. That he was not a burglar. Not a threat. Just a kid who got turned around after a night out.
The details matter here. Farrell has been on the force since 2005. A veteran officer. Someone who should know better. Someone who, according to the charge, unreasonably used deadly force without any consideration of using less lethal means. The complaint notes he was behind cover, at a safe distance, as Pysher approached with his hands in the air.
This is not abstract. This is not a policy debate. This is a young man who will not finish his senior year. A family that lost a son. Friends who lost someone they called Bubba. And an officer who now faces the weight of criminal charges because, according to prosecutors, he chose to shoot when he did not need to.
I keep thinking about the taser on that belt. The non-lethal options Steele mentioned. The gap between what could have happened and what did happen. A taser does not always work. Nothing is risk-free. But it is something. An option. A chance to de-escalate before reaching for a gun.
The law in Pennsylvania is clear. Deadly force must be necessary. It must be reasonable. It must be justified. Steele said it was none of those things here. He said he was obligated under the law to bring charges. He did.
Farrell is out on bail. He will face a preliminary hearing in September. The case will move forward. There will be more proceedings. More arguments. More time before any final resolution.
For Pysher's family, that timeline does not bring him back. For anyone watching, it does not erase the fear this kind of story creates. The fear that a wrong turn, a confused moment, a simple mistake could end in gunfire. That an officer with other options might still choose to shoot.
This charge does not fix that. It does not undo what happened on August 23. But it does say something. That the system, at least in this case, looked at the evidence and said this was not okay. That a life was lost due to a tragic misunderstanding. That the use of force was not lawful.
I do not know what comes next in court. I do not know how this will end. I do know that a 22-year-old is gone. That an officer has been charged. That the details, as they have emerged, point to a failure that should not have happened.
More on: Politics
That has to matter.