Medical schools are staring down a choice that cuts to the bone. Keep admissions policies they say are core to training doctors for diverse communities. Or risk losing federal funding that keeps their lights on.
The Trump administration has made its position clear. Diversity initiatives in medical school admissions are under fire. Investigations are mounting. The Justice Department has opened probes into more than two dozen medical schools. They're looking for evidence that schools are still using race as a factor in who gets in.
This is not subtle pressure. The Treasury Department proposed a rule in early September that would strip tax-exempt status from private schools that consider race in admissions. That rule would kick in after May 2027 if it becomes final. Schools could lose billions in federal research funding. They could lose access to federal payments for medical services performed in their hospitals and clinics.
Duke University School of Medicine just got a notice of violation from the Department of Health and Human Services. The government says Duke intentionally discriminated against white and Asian applicants. The finding came after a yearlong investigation. Duke has ten days to respond or face referral to the Justice Department.
George Washington University's medical school got similar findings in late August. The Justice Department said the school gives Black and Hispanic applicants an advantage in admissions. The school supposedly banned explicit preferences but still scours applications for indicators that suggest students are Black or Hispanic.
The Legal Ground Is Shifting
The Supreme Court restricted the consideration of race in admissions in its 2023 Students for Fair Admissions decision. But the legal landscape remains unresolved on what schools can still do. The Trump administration is testing the boundaries hard.
Federal officials say any favoritism based on race violates Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. That law bars discrimination in education for any school that receives federal funds. The administration is using that law as a hammer.
The Department of Education's Office for Civil Rights announced Title VI investigations into five medical schools in July. Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth. Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University. Saint Louis University School of Medicine. Western University of Health Sciences. William Carey University College of Osteopathic Medicine.
Those investigations followed related enforcement by the Justice Department and HHS against higher education institutions. The pattern is consistent. The administration is pushing to eliminate race-based admissions across the board.
Some schools have already scrubbed their websites of diversity programs. Penn Medicine changed the title of Roy Hamilton, who led the medical school's diversity efforts. He stepped into a new position leading Penn's faculty senate after the Trump administration cracked down on diversity initiatives in higher education.
What Schools Say They're Trying to Do
Medical schools argue that diverse doctors are needed to treat underserved communities. They say their admissions policies are designed to produce physicians who will work in areas that lack adequate healthcare access.
Advocates worry the Trump moves will hurt those communities most in need. The argument is straightforward. Patients do better when their doctors understand their backgrounds. When doctors come from similar communities. When they speak the same languages.
But the administration sees it differently. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said programs that use race as a deciding factor constitute illegal racial discrimination. The proposed rule says such benefits in admissions, scholarships and facilities would be incompatible with tax-exempt status.
The Justice Department's Civil Rights Division has opened more than 100 investigations into university admissions practices. They issued findings against several medical schools already. In June, the Division announced an additional 15 medical school investigations.
Schools are now weighing potential consequences in a high-profile, high-stakes fight. Some are auditing their public-facing materials. Websites, course catalogs, office names, scholarship criteria, admissions materials. Inconsistency between what an institution says publicly and what it has certified to federal agencies is itself an investigative predicate.
Renaming an office or removing a webpage does not resolve the underlying question. The government is looking at whether decisions turn on protected characteristics. Schools are reviewing admissions, hiring, scholarship and programming criteria against the standards the government is applying.
The False Claims Act exposure is real. The Justice Department's Civil Rights Fraud Initiative uses the FCA against federal funding recipients that certify compliance with civil rights laws while allegedly maintaining discriminatory programs. That initiative reaches any recipient of federal funds. Universities and academic medical centers are within its scope.
Medical schools face a genuine bind. They believe their mission requires training diverse classes of physicians. The federal government says that mission cannot use race as a factor. The schools need federal funding to operate.
No one knows how this ends. Courts will likely decide. But in the meantime, schools must choose. Stick with policies they see as core to their mission. Or risk critical federal funding that pays for research, training, and patient care.
The choice is not abstract. It is about who becomes a doctor in America. And who gets left out.
More on: Health & Medicine