Boosie Badazz handed over $600,000 because he was told cash would buy a presidential pardon. It did not. The pardon never arrived. And now he is suing to get half of it back.
This is not a rumor. It is what Boosie told Lesley Stahl on 60 Minutes. He said he paid the money up front to two Washington operatives, Jack Burkman and Jacob Wohl, after they pitched him on their access to President Trump's clemency process. He believed the deal was simple. Pay the fee. Get the pardon.
The pardon did not come. Boosie pleaded guilty in August 2025 to a federal gun charge. In January 2026 he was sentenced to time served, three years of supervised release, and 300 hours of community service. He avoided prison. But he is out $600,000.
His contract with the brokers reportedly included a clause that if no pardon was granted by a set deadline, half the fee would be returned. That refund has not been paid. The brokers dispute the clause. They say the final agreement was never signed. They say any promise of a refund was not binding. Boosie says he was misled. He is pursuing arbitration to recover the money.
A hidden-camera look inside the pardon market
The 60 Minutes report did not stop at Boosie's story. Stahl and her team ran a hidden-camera operation to test how the market works. A cooperating felon, identified in reporting as Michael Covino, met with Burkman and Wohl while wearing a wire. On tape, the pair pitched a path to a Trump pardon for roughly $300,000, with a timeline as early as October. They said they could deploy MAGA influencers and allies to push the case. Text messages referenced names like Laura Loomer, House Speaker Mike Johnson, and Erika Kirk as possible endorsers of the pardon request.
The report frames this as a new layer on top of the official clemency process. The Justice Department still reviews pardon petitions. But the segment argues that a parallel track has emerged, one where money and connections can shortcut the queue. Donations appear to help. Those who can pay hire brokers who sell ties to the president for exorbitant fees. The language on screen was blunt. It called it a marketplace of money and mercy.
Senior Democratic lawmakers have said they want to investigate this ecosystem if their party regains control of Congress. They cite the CBS video as evidence that a shadow process may be operating alongside the formal one. The report does not allege that White House staff took bribes. It does not claim that Trump personally received cash for specific pardons. The concern is narrower and still serious. It is about intermediaries who charge huge sums while claiming they can move the needle inside the administration.
The catch that turns wonder into worry
I will say the quiet part out loud. The technology of modern influence is not new. Lobbying is legal. Advocacy is legal. Paying someone to argue your case is, on its face, allowed. The catch is what happens when the pitch crosses from advocacy into the suggestion that outcomes can be purchased. That is where trust breaks. That is where the system starts to look like a menu.
Boosie's case makes the risk concrete. He is a public figure with a long criminal record. He is also a person who believed a specific promise. Pay this amount. Get this result. When the result did not arrive, he was left with a bill and a lawsuit. For anyone watching, the lesson is plain. Money changed hands. A pardon did not. And the people who took the money are now fighting over whether they owe any of it back.
There are open questions the report does not resolve. It is unclear whether paying brokers like this violates any law. It is unclear how common these arrangements are. It is unclear how many other people have paid large sums and received nothing. What is clear is that a market has formed around access to Trump's pardon power. The report shows pitches, texts, and contracts that suggest fees can reach into the millions. It also shows that the traditional clemency process can be bypassed by those who can afford to hire well-connected intermediaries.
I do not know what Trump knew about these specific deals. The report does not say. It focuses on the brokers and their claims. It shows a system where influence is packaged and sold. It shows a rapper who paid $600,000 and still carries a conviction. It shows a cooperating witness recorded on hidden camera being told a pardon could be secured for a price.
This is not a story about whether Boosie deserves mercy. It is a story about whether mercy can be bought. The answer the report suggests is uncomfortable. Money may not guarantee a pardon. But it can buy a seat at a table most people never see. And when that table starts to look like a counter, the whole idea of equal justice starts to wobble.
Explore: Politics